I had an interesting conversation with a member in my church. My friend Grace who helps with the youth group was showing me an add an organization was trying to get played during the super bowl. NBC would not air it.
After viewing the add
I was laughing at how they used President Obama in a Pro-life ad. I said that this was ironic to me because he is so Pro-Abortion.
A wonderful lady in my church overheard and wanted to set me straight as to the correct terminology to use.
She instructed me to use the terms Pro-Choice and Anti-Abortion. She informed me that President Obama is not Pro-abortion....he is Pro-Choice...and apparently there is a difference.
Basically you can be for a mothers choice to violently murder her children and still be against the murder...you just want her to have the right to do it. I did not follow. I still don't.
And Pro-Life was inaccurate because a lot of people who are against abortion are for capital punishment. Wanting to see Babies saved and murders punished....well that means you are not pro-life.
She began to share how she views that as very hypocritical. (Not the first time I have heard this ridiculous argument.) I think it is really humorous when people who are Pro-Abortion and Anti-Capital punishment want to accuse Pro-Life people of being hypocrites.
Let me get this straight....I want to save innocent babies and kill guilty murderers and you want to kill innocent babies and save guilty murderers and I am the hypocrite?!?!?
Can someone please explain this to me?
Why does the President see abortion as "a deeply moral issue" and yet is still for it. Constantly voting for abortion legislature?
Listen if abortion is not the murder of an innocent baby than what does morality have to do with it? If a fetus is just human tissue and not a human being...than women should be able to have an abortion like clipping their fingernails.
But if it is the murder of a human being than yes it is a moral issue indeed!
I do not care what a person's reason for believing in abortion...it almost always changes when you ask the question...what if the baby were 5 years old? If you believe that a woman's "right" to choose changes....than the issue is not the why the abortion... but rather is the baby less of a human at 2 months in the womb than at 5 yrs. If someone can convince me of that than I would be Pro- Abortion too.
No one can....the science is just not there!
3 comments:
I'm with you! I don't understand how people could want to spare the lives of guilty serial killers but not want to spare the lives of innocent babies! It doesn't make sense to me at all!!!!
i agree my little buddy..... i think i love u!!!!!! ;]
Abortion is essentially the outworking of the evolutionary worldview that denies God as Creator. If all we are accidents of spontaneous self-generating origins, then obviously there is no genuine intellectually or morally cogent arguement for any standard. Everything is a matter of subjectivity. So, if you want to kill babies, you kill them. Or old people. Or Jews. Or Christians. Or whoever it is expedient to kill - after all, if we are afloat in a meaningless, non-created spontaneous universe made by no one for nobody - who is to say abortion is different than picking your nose? NO GOD = NO OBJECTIVE TRUTH. All becomes subjective. My view is as good as yours, and yours as good as mine. And if I think killing babies is a good thing, who are YOU to have the audacity to say otherwise? Welcome to your autonmous, ethically bankrupt culture folks.
Post a Comment