There are two kinds of Bible-themed movies in Hollywood. The kind that sticks fairly close to the Biblical narrative and serves overall to promote the lessons and reality of the Bible, and the kind that uses the Bible to lure in an audience excited to see a Biblically based film only to serve them a fiction that serves to undermine the story of the Bible and to interject liberal/Hollywood agenda. Son of God movie is the first kind and the Noah movie is the second.
Noah is a movie that makes God look evil. It is littered with lies that slowly cloud the whole message of the story. According to Ken Ham’s review of the movie Ken Ham's Review
Noah claims God does not want man to repopulate the earth. He believes this so strongly he vows to personally murder the baby of his pregnant daughter-in-law if the baby turns out to be a girl. The reason is because they are supposed to be the last generation of mankind and that God was going to replant Eden with all the “innocent” animals.
This is one of many things wrong with the movie but lets just explore the implications of this one thing.
God does not want man to repopulate the earth:
1. The first and most obvious problem with this is that it changes the story of God’s wrath towards evil and His mercy towards mankind by bringing salvation through the ark and the line of Noah into a story of God’s wrath and complete annihilation of mankind after Noah and sons die.
2. It undermines the Gospel of Jesus because it promotes the idea that God’s intent was to completely destroy mankind by killing everyone except Noah and His sons and allowing them to die of old age.
3. In this movie God did not intend to allow the human race to survive at all. He was just allowing Noah and his sons to take care of the animals on the ark and then live out their natural lives, but He does not want them to fill the earth which is in direct contrast to what Scripture says. (Gen. 9:1)
I know not watching a movie seems trivial but I hope enough Christians avoid it to send a financial message to Hollywood that simply says, making a movie based off a Biblical Character but that undermines the Scriptures and the Character of God at every turn is not going to be supported by your “intended” audience. Better to make a purely secular one than a blasphemous one!
This movie is an insult to the Bible believing audience it hopes to attract. They assume that the changes are subtle enough that people will say: “well who knows, maybe it could have happened that way” without even realizing what this movie says about God and His Character. Taking a character from the Bible to draw an audience so you can insult the God of that audience is what this film will clearly do. I do not want any part of it and I hope you don’t either!
Here is a interview with Russell Crowe that might shed some light on the Attitude of the actor who played a character the bible calls a "preacher of righteousness" and who Russell calls "not even nice"

